As a standalone All Honky Caper, Road to Perdition is technically superb yet otherwise unremarkable; as an adaptation of Max Allan Collins’ gritty graphic novel, it’s an unequivocal failure. Sam Mendes surrounds himself with talent and hopes that Conrad Hall’s shadowy, deep focus anamorphic photography, the lush art direction, snappy period costumes and Thomas Newman’s score will create a fair enough substitute for an engaging plot. If they had kept to the original story instead of fucking around with it to the point where they might as well have optioned a different property, Road to Perdition would have been one of the greatest action movies ever. Instead, it’s a boring, glacially paced ‘mood piece’ without any tension, inherent drama or, worst of all, any action sequences whatsoever.
The source work is a potent blend of gangster myth and truth, with many historical figures interacting on the sidelines as Mob enforcer Michael O’Sullivan wages a single-handed war on his former Mick employers after they kill his wife and one of his kids. He roams the country in a beat-up roadster with his teenage son, ripping off ‘dirty banks’ where Al Capone launders his money and occasionally getting into epic firefights. Sure, it’s nothing but a rehash of Koike’s Lone Wolf and Cub, and Collins is a bit too obvious about his influences (during one gun battle, O’Sullivan slides down a banister while firing two pistols), but the story is as fun as it is trashy, whipping by in a flash and looking great while doing so.
Road to Perdition. as Mendes’ followup to the mysteriously acclaimed American Beauty, still looks great, and has a topnotch cast, but David Self’s script is a complete hack job. Paul Newman and Daniel Craig play father-and-son Mob brass (name unwisely changed from Looney to Rooney), and the two scenes they share are fantastic. As villains, they’re uncommonly sympathetic. Too bad Tom Hanks, as the hitman with the heart of gold, is such an ineffectual presence as ostensible “hero”, his teenage son is the most passive protagonist ever, and Mendes hasn’t a clue how to handle the handful of violent sequences that remain. This brings us to the fatal flaw: Jude Law as a terminally quirky assassin who loves to photograph corpses. He replaces the armies of faceless thugs who, in Collins’ B&W pages, seemed to appear out of nowhere and spared no innocent bystander.
What remains after countless alterations is a chase movie without an ounce of urgency or suspense, a revenge movie with only minimal, artsy revenge, a ‘family drama’ that, for all its time spent showing characters brooding in dark rooms musing about Fathers and Sons and Original Sin, has no emotional resonance whatsoever. It’s clear that Dreamworks thought they had another chunk of juicy Oscar Bait dangling on their hook and tailored the story to make it “More Substantial”. By doing so they drained every drop of life out of what should have been a cheerfully amoral, ultraviolent, unpretentious gangster epic directed by John Woo. Too bad he was laying an egg with the Jungian clusterfuck Windtalkers at the time this was being made. Could have been a masterpiece.
